• Join AIWW 2021
  • Stay Up to Date
  • Login
Amsterdam International Water Web
  • Home
  • News
    • Latest
    • Agenda
  • Insights
  • About
    • About
    • Themes and topics
    • PAC Members
    • Management Board
    • AIWW team
  • What We Do
    • What we do
    • AIWW Activities
    • Water Solutions #1 – Clean Water and Ecosystem Restoration
    • Water Solutions #2 – Reuse, Recycle & Recover
    • Amsterdam Agreements Overview
      • Amsterdam Agreements Introduction
    • AIWW Global Inventory
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Latest
    • Agenda
  • Insights
  • About
    • About
    • Themes and topics
    • PAC Members
    • Management Board
    • AIWW team
  • What We Do
    • What we do
    • AIWW Activities
    • Water Solutions #1 – Clean Water and Ecosystem Restoration
    • Water Solutions #2 – Reuse, Recycle & Recover
    • Amsterdam Agreements Overview
      • Amsterdam Agreements Introduction
    • AIWW Global Inventory
No Result
View All Result
Amsterdam International Water Web
No Result
View All Result
Home Best Practices

The Watson database provides a better picture of the emission routes of micropollutants in water

Erwin Roex, Nanette van Duijnhoven, Rianne van der Meiracker, Jos van Gils (Deltares), Anja Derksen (AD eco advies)

March 16, 2021
in Best Practices, Blue Green Deals with Integrated Solutions, Clean Water and Ecosystem Restoration

 

Please note that this article was previously published in H2O’s Water matters

Summary:

The Watson database collates monitoring data from water managers concerning micropollutants in influent and effluent from wastewater treatment plants. These data can serve as input for emission estimates for substances. These estimates can provide information regarding the origin of micropollutants that are hard to assess using other methods, as this article demonstrates for (the personal use of) over-the-counter pharmaceuticals for humans and pets. With the most recent update to the Watson database, it has also become possible to derive trends for some (groups of) substances, such as PFAS, from the time series of measurements: a useful tool for evaluating the effectiveness of policy measures.

Introduction:

Water managers are tasked with ensuring good water quality in their management area. Insight into the origin of pollutants – and thus into how emissions can be limited – is a key part of this. The Netherlands Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (Emissions Register) and the accompanying Watson database are important tools in this. Deltares and AD eco advies have updated the Watson database. This article highlights the key results from the analysis of new data, and some of the resulting exciting applications.

About Watson Database:

The Watson database is often used to estimate emissions from the wastewater chain to surface water. The database contains monitoring data for micropollutants in the influent and effluent of Dutch wastewater treatment plants (WWTP), and is freely accessible to anyone (website: Nederlandse EmissieRegistratie). Emission Factors (EF) and Purification Efficiencies (PE) for substances from wastewater treatment plants are derived from the data (see box) as recorded in the Netherlands Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (Emissions Register). The EF is the emission of a substance (the occurrence in the wastewater treatment plant influent) in grams per inhabitant; the PE is the percentage of this that is removed by a wastewater treatment plant. These parameters can be used to determine emissions from the wastewater chain to the surface water.

Deltares and AD eco advies have completed an update of the Watson database, compiling data for the period from 2014 to 2018. These data were further analysed, and yielded a wealth of interesting data that can be used for all sorts of applications. Thanks to the update, the database now includes data about 1,310 substances, of which 112 have been included in the Emissions Register following further analysis. This article highlights the most interesting results of the analysis and a number of applications.

Framework:

Determining emission factors and purification efficiencies

The monitoring data in the Watson database of the Netherlands Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (Emissions Register) are obtained from regional water managers. If they are to be usable in terms of extrapolating reliable emission factors and purification efficiencies, these data must meet a number of conditions. For example, to determine the emission factor, at least seven measurements must be available, taken within one year and from a minimum of three different wastewater treatment plants. To determine the purification efficiency, the above data must furthermore be available for three different years. If there are sufficient measurements above the reporting limit (RL), calculation of the emission factor is based on the median value (>50% RL) in the effluent or the influent. Is there is insufficient information available, the average is taken (>25% RL). Values <RL are not included in the calculation of the purification efficiency.

Pharmaceutical residues:

The Watson database already held data on a number of pharmaceutical residues. The recent update has increased the volume of data, and so for a number of a substances, a new or improved emission factor or purification efficiency value has been derived. For example, the key figures for 20 pharmaceutical residues were improved, and 12 substances were added to the Emissions Register. By way of validation, we compared our results with emissions estimates based on sales figures combined with excretion factors. The comparison shows that the results from the two methodologies are generally in line with one another, see figure 1. There are complementary results for a number of pharmaceuticals. These are pharmaceuticals whose sales and/or usage are not well documented, such as over the counter pharmaceuticals (medicines that can be sold freely, for example paracetamol, ibuprofen and diclofenac). The measurements provide a better picture of these. For substances that are broken down quickly, or for which there is no effective analysis method available, emission estimates based on sales figures provide a better overview. Examples of this latter category are cytostatics and metformin.

Figure 1. Concentrations of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater treatment plant influent, measured (x-axis) and estimated on the basis of use (y-axis)

PFAS:

Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have recently attracted a lot of attention because of the ubiquitous nature of these toxic substances in soils, surface water and sediments, and the associated risks. Much remains unknown about the sources (type, location, size) from which PFAS reach the environment. The contribution of wastewater treatment plant effluents to the levels in surface water was determined based on the available calculations through to 2018. For a number of compounds in the PFAS group, there are sufficient data to derive both a purification efficiency and an emission factor.

Because the production, along with a large number of applications, of PFOS have been prohibited since 2010, the study looked at whether the concentration of PFOS in effluent has also decreased since then. The available measurements show that this is indeed the case; since 2010, the average concentration in effluents has decreased by 75% (figure 2). This is in line with the patterns of concentrations in surface water over the past ten years. These results suggest that emissions from wastewater treatment plants and flows from abroad together substantially determine the concentrations in surface water (and ultimately in water beds). Further study will be needed to confirm this.

It is notable that some wastewater treatment plants in South Holland have an increased concentration of PFOA compared with the rest of the Netherlands. This is probably the result of atmospheric deposition in the past, caused by the former PFOA production site in Dordrecht, which still causes increased concentrations in the wastewater chain through runoff and leaching from urban run-off and from wastewater.

Figure 2: Progression over time of PFOS concentrations in wastewater treatment plant effluent, based on available measurements. The wastewater treatment plants samples are taken from may vary each year. The boxplots indicate the median (horizontal line), the 25 and 75 percentile (the blue box), and the range (black ‘whiskers’) in concentrations.

Biocides and crop protection agents:

A group of substances also found regularly in both influents and effluents are pesticides for domestic applications. These include insecticides (such as fipronil and imidacloprid) and herbicides (for weed control on paved surfaces, such as glyphosate). The emissions from a number of these agents has already been estimated in the Emissions Register, but via different methods and routes. Since these emission estimates are quite rough, the study looked if the data from the Watson database could improve these emission estimates.

Imidacloprid:

Limited use of imidacloprid is still permitted in greenhouse horticulture, and is also found in pet medical treatments (to combat fleas and ticks). Whereas waste water from greenhouses used to be discharged directly into surface water – usually barely purified – today the emission route is increasingly through the sewage system. It is estimated that in 2018, 91 kg reached the surface water via wastewater treatment plants. It is difficult to estimate what proportion of this came from greenhouse horticulture, and what proportion from private households. It is notable that relatively high concentrations are found at wastewater treatment plants that are not located in greenhouse horticulture areas. This implies that imidacloprid emissions as a result of use for animals are a substantial source.

Fipronil:

This is also the case with the insecticide fipronil, which is used only for pets. From monitoring data, it was calculated that in 2018, 22 kg of fipronil reached the surface water via wastewater treatment plants. Provisional rough emission estimates were recently made for both fipronil and imidacloprid, based on application scenarios (Lahr et al., 2019). According to these scenarios, the loads for both substances calculated via Watson would be more than sufficient to exceed the standard for both substances. The use of veterinary medicines in pets will be further elaborated in the coming years in the theme ‘Veterinary medicines: sources, routes and risks’ within the Kennisimpuls Waterkwaliteit (Water Quality Knowledge Impulse) (see the Kennisimpuls Waterkwaliteit website).

Herbicides on paving:

Herbicides such as glyphosate are also regularly found in domestic wastewater. Glyphosate is rapidly converted into aminomethyl phosphonic acid (AMPA) in the environment, which means that the glyphosate concentrations measured underestimates  the actual emissions Additionally, these substances may be used by both private individuals and public authorities, which makes the use of monitoring data less appropriate. Public authority use of herbicides on paved surfaces and in public green spaces has become severely restricted in recent years; private individuals are still permitted to use these products without restriction. In 2019, the CBS (Statistics Netherlands) and the RIVM (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) published new figures on use by public authorities and private individuals. Based on this, we made new estimates for these agents. These estimates reveal that the emission of a substance such as glyphosate by private individuals (3,172 kg) is many times higher than use by public authorities (2 kg) and the agriculture sector (37 kg).

Conclusions:

The monitoring data obtained from regional water managers, collated in the Watson database, are a good basis for estimating emissions for these substances. This can provide additional information about emission routes that is difficult to identify in other ways. With the most recent update to the Watson database, it has also become possible to derive trends for some (groups of) substances from the series of measurements. As a result, it is possible to evaluate the effectiveness of policy measures.

References:

  • Lahr et al.(2019) Diergeneesmiddelen in het milieu, een synthese van de huidige kennis. STOWA report 2019-26
  • www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2019/35/gebruik-bestrijdingsmiddelen-overheden-fors-gedaald
  • www.emissieregistratie.nl/erpubliek/erpub/wsn/default.aspx
  • www.kennisimpulswaterkwaliteit.nl
  • www.rivm.nl/publicaties/particulier-gebruik-biociden-2014-2017

 

Tags: Water Matters
Share4Tweet2Share1Send
Previous Post

Microbial fingerprint for source tracking in surface water management

Next Post

How the ‘Internet of Nature’ can help optimize water use for cities’ ambitious tree-planting targets     

Nupur Jain

Nupur Jain

Related Posts

Practical test to remove micropollutants from OWTS effluent
Best Practices

Practical test to remove micropollutants from OWTS effluent

April 12, 2021
Best Practices

Removal efficiencies of pharmaceutical residues at 18 wastewater treatment plants

April 6, 2021
Microbial fingerprint for source tracking in surface water management
Best Practices

Microbial fingerprint for source tracking in surface water management

March 16, 2021
Determining the origin of pollutants across management boundaries: Meuse river example
Best Practices

Determining the origin of pollutants across management boundaries: Meuse river example

March 16, 2021
‘Green’ flocculants from wastewater: the knife cuts both ways
Best Practices

‘Green’ flocculants from wastewater: the knife cuts both ways

March 16, 2021
Next Post
How the ‘Internet of Nature’ can help optimize water use for cities’ ambitious tree-planting targets     

How the ‘Internet of Nature’ can help optimize water use for cities’ ambitious tree-planting targets     

AIWW Agenda

AIWW Webinar ‘Clean Water and Ecosystem Restoration’

26 Mar 2021, online

AIWW Webinar ‘Reuse, recycle and recover’

30 Apr 2021, online

AIWW Webinar ‘Risk and Resilience’

28 May 2021, online

AIWW Webinar ‘Community engagement and inter-sectoral collaboration’

25 June 2021, online

AIWW 2021

31 Oct – 5 Nov 2021, Amsterdam

Aquatech 2021

2-5 Nov, Amsterdam

Global Water Agenda

Browse by Category

  • Amsterdam Agreements (5)
  • Best Practices (18)
  • Blue Green Deals with Integrated Solutions (19)
  • Cities (2)
  • Clean Water and Ecosystem Restoration (15)
  • Community engagement and inter-sectoral collaboration (6)
  • Conferentie (7)
  • Featured (44)
  • Future Water Leaders (13)
  • Global Inventory (1)
  • Industries (2)
  • News (43)
  • PAC (6)
  • Reuse, Recycle and Recover (9)
  • Risks and Resilience (7)
  • Sponsor (1)
  • Summit (3)
  • Utilies (3)
  • Water Solutions #1. Clean Water and Ecosystem Restoration (8)
  • Water Solutions #2. Reuse, Recycle and Recover (5)
  • Water Solutions #3. Risks and Resilience (2)
  • Water Solutions #4. Community engagement and inter-sectoral collaboration (2)

Browse by Tags

University of Thessaly urban ecology urban ecosystems urban land institute utilities value capture value water valuing water valuing water initiative Veronica Manfredi Vitens W@tskills waste water wastewater wastewater management wastewater resource recovery leaders water water europe water event water events water managament water management watermanagement Water Matters water professionals water scarcity water sector water solutions water sources water themes water usage water youth network webinar wetskills Wetskills Foundation working together world energy council world health WWF youth youth for the rhine youth for water youth involvement youth perspective youth programme

Contact information

Koningskade 40 | 2596 AA | the Hague |
the Netherlands

Phone :
+31 (0) 70 – 32 22 765

Email:
 info@amsterdamiww.com

Latest News

  • Practical test to remove micropollutants from OWTS effluent April 12, 2021
  • “How do we ensure ecosystem balance in watersheds while managing water quality requirements?” April 7, 2021
  • United Nations World Water Development Report ‘Valuing Water’ April 7, 2021

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Latest Newsletters

  • AIWW – The Drop 💧 – “How do we ensure ecosystem balance in watersheds while managing water quality requirements?”
  • AIWW – The Drop 💧 – Looking back on the first AIWW Webinar in our series of 4 – test
  • AIWW – The Drop 💧 – Veronica Manfredi: “The power of youth is quintessential for the water sector”
  • AIWW – The Drop 💧 – Veronica Manfredi: “The power of youth is quintessential for the water sector” – test
  • AIWW – The Drop 💧 – Claudia Castell-Exner: “Dialogue is the best approach to understand”

© 2021 International Water Week       Disclaimer | Privacy Statement

No Result
View All Result
  • Home New
  • News
  • Latest
  • AIWW
    • About AIWW
    • Themes and Topics 2019
    • Themes and topics
    • Aquatech
  • Organisation
    • PAC Members
    • Management Board
    • AIWW Team
  • Insights
    • Future Water Leaders
    • Plugged
  • Amsterdam Agreements
    • Amsterdam Agreements Introduction
    • Amsterdam Agreements Overview

© 2021 International Water Week       Disclaimer | Privacy Statement

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.